Assalamualaikum!
(I’ve been writing this for quite sometime but in the recent event happened in Malaysia, I guess I had to publish this entry now)It has been a long time since my last post. I was a bit busy finishing my project (plus doing other stuff) and also because it was Ramadhan, I am pretty much occupied with doing stuff. Now that I have finished my project and submitted my paper, I am a bit free (well I have to do other stuff as well - am trying to be a bit productive now) so InsyaAllah I will try to write something here. (btw, the purpose of this blog was initially for me to prepare myself for writing my paper as what I've stated in
my 2nd entry of this blog and since I am already done with my studies/paper, I am not sure what the fate of this blog might be in the near future – just wait and see how everything goes)
How often you hear people in conversations that they associate some brand name with either greatness or with poor qualities? For example when people are buying laptops, they will say Lenovo (previously it was IBM) Thinkpad is the best model for business use. For jeans, we associate Levi's to be a good brand. Intel is labelled as the leading brand in microprocessors. "Cap Ayam" is a brand or label that we put on something that is bad in quality.
Once we have associated something with a brand or label, often we jumped straight into the conclusion that all items/things that carry the brand's name/label is of the same quality. For instance, Proton in previous years made some bad quality cars, but that doesn't mean Proton cars are bad now (I am a Proton user hehe). So it is wrong to say label that all Protons are bad. Windows are another example. Just because some windows version crashed often, doesn’t mean the new Windows 7 will be bad as well.

Labels are not only given to products but also to people. Once we have given them labels, we will give treatments to the people according to the label we have given them. For example, when we are doing some act of worship and someone said to us "
in Islam, we have never done this, this is an innovation in our religion", we quickly without thinking, label them as "
the Wahhabis". And if people do things that we have never seen before, we label them as "
the Bid'ahs" without even checking their dalils of making such things. And also, when we have labeled someone as this or that, whatever they say is wrong and irrelevant to our lives.
I am quite sad that even in this day of age, some people are still practicing that the Jahiliyyah method.
The Jahiliyyah Method"
Ah apa dia tau, dia tu kan Ahli Parti XXX!"
"
Tu la dia orang XXX, merepek je"
When presented some fact or arguments, the people with the Jahiliyyah mentality will often give responses like that. I like what Dr MAZA said before "
Islam ini berdasarkan hujan dan fakta". If you disagree with something, bring your own arguments to the table. By just pointing that he is a "Wahhabi" or from political party XXX, you are not making your arguments any stronger.
If you read the Quran, you should notice the people of the old days. When Prophets came to them bringing them the word of Allah, you know what were their responses? Their responses were almost the same regardless of which Prophets those people got.
In Surah Al - A’raaf (The Heights)
قَالَ الْمَلَأُ مِنْ قَوْمِهِ إِنَّا لَنَرَاكَ فِي ضَلَالٍ مُبِينٍ
[7:60] Ketua-ketua dari kaumnya berkata: Sesungguhnya kami nampakmu (wahai Nuh) berada dalam kesesatan yang nyata.
In Surah Al Qalam (The Pen)
إِذَا تُتْلَىٰ عَلَيْهِ آيَاتُنَا قَالَ أَسَاطِيرُ الْأَوَّلِينَ
[68:15] Apabila dibacakan kepadanya ayat-ayat keterangan Kami, dia berkata: (Ini ialah) cerita-cerita dongeng orang-orang dahulu kala.
In Surah As Saffat (The Rangers)
وَإِذَا رَأَوْا آيَةً يَسْتَسْخِرُونَ
[37:14] Dan apabila mereka melihat sesuatu tanda (yang membuktikan kekuasaan Kami dan kebenaranmu), mereka mencari-cari jalan memperolok-olokkannya, -
وَقَالُوا إِنْ هَٰذَا إِلَّا سِحْرٌ مُبِينٌ
[37:15] Serta mereka berkata: Ini tidak lain hanyalah sihir yang nyata.
They never brought any kinds of evidence or arguments to refute the claims of the Prophets. You should also notice that Allah, in the Holy Quran, challenged those people who doubted Quran to bring a Chapter that is comparable to the Quran. Meaning, before they could refute anything, they should bring proof that supported their stand.
In Surah Al Baqarah (The Cow)
وَإِنْ كُنْتُمْ فِي رَيْبٍ مِمَّا نَزَّلْنَا عَلَىٰ عَبْدِنَا فَأْتُوا بِسُورَةٍ مِنْ مِثْلِهِ وَادْعُوا شُهَدَاءَكُمْ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ صَادِقِينَ
[2:23]. Dan kalau kamu ada menaruh syak tentang apa yang Kami turunkan (Al-Quran) kepada hamba kami (Muhammad), maka cubalah buat dan datangkanlah satu surah yang sebanding dengan Al-Quran itu dan panggilah orang-orang yang kamu percaya boleh menolong kamu selain dari Allah, jika betul kamu orang-orang yang benar.
Do not be like the ignorant or the jahiliyyah, they will just say "
ah that guy is stupid" or "
since he is from this group/party/organisation, they are wrong". I admit although some organisations are like that (meaning most of their actions are stupid), but that doesn't necessarily mean that they will always be wrong all the time. If they state some facts, like 2+2=4, they are still right.
We should not be prejudice in making our decisions and judgements. Else, we are no different that those people who refuted the word of Allah by just simply saying "
It is a sheer magic" or "
these are nothing but tales of the Ancients" without even pondering whether the messages made sense or not.
In Surah Ad Dhariyat (The winnowing winds)
كَذَٰلِكَ مَا أَتَى الَّذِينَ مِنْ قَبْلِهِمْ مِنْ رَسُولٍ إِلَّا قَالُوا سَاحِرٌ أَوْ مَجْنُونٌ
[51:52] Demikianlah (keadaan tiap-tiap kaum terhadap Rasulnya samalah seperti keadaan kaummu wahai Muhammad) tidak ada seorang Rasul pun yang datang kepada kaum-kaum yang terdahulu dari mereka, melainkan ada yang berkata: Dia adalah seorang ahli sihir atau seorang gila.
When we discredit people arguments just because they are associated with some party, we are acting exactly like the jahiliyyah. They have never brought any proof to deny Muhammad S.A.W as Allah’s prophet, instead they were just saying
In Surah Al-Furqan (The Standard)
وَقَالَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا إِنْ هَٰذَا إِلَّا إِفْكٌ افْتَرَاهُ وَأَعَانَهُ عَلَيْهِ قَوْمٌ آخَرُونَ ۖ فَقَدْ جَاءُوا ظُلْمًا وَزُورًا
[25:4] Dan orang-orang yang kafir itu berkata: (Al-Quran) ini hanyalah satu perkara dusta yang direka-reka oleh Muhammad dan ia dibantu membuatnya oleh kaum yang lain. Maka (dengan kata-kata itu) sesungguhnya mereka telah mendatangkan satu tuduhan yang zalim dan dusta.
In the Holy Quran, there are multiples places where you will find verses that gave evidences of the existence of the Supreme Power - Allah SWT, and the proof that Islam is the only religion for mankind.
In Surah Al-Furqan (The Standard)
وَلَقَدْ صَرَّفْنَاهُ بَيْنَهُمْ لِيَذَّكَّرُوا فَأَبَىٰ أَكْثَرُ النَّاسِ إِلَّا كُفُورًا
[25:50] Dan demi sesungguhnya! Kami telah berulang-ulang kali menyebarkan hujjah-hujjah di antara manusia melalui Al-Quran supaya mereka berfikir (mengenalku serta bersyukur); dalam pada itu kebanyakan manusia tidak mahu melainkan berlaku kufur.
It is really weird that in this day of Information Superhighway age, there are still people who acted like they came from the Jahiliyyah period. Most of the time, I see these people, when they failed to bring proofs to support their claims, they will resort to either
strawman arguments or
ad hominem attacks (close to character assassination).
In the recent event of the arrest of the Ex Perlis Mufti, Dr MAZA, I am saddened that some of my contacts cheered with the arrest made on Dr MAZA. I am not making any assumptions of why they agreed/cheered but I could take a hint that Dr MAZA is labelled as Wahhabi by them. The sad thing about it is that I really doubt that they could prove Dr MAZA as Wahhabi (
Dr MAZA has denied that countless of time) and to me, they are just making a baseless accusation.
“Presidennya, Datuk Syed Hussein al-Habshee berkata, pihaknya menerima banyak rungutan dan aduan di kalangan ahlinya dan masyarakat setempat di Wilayah Persekutuan dan Selangor tentang ceramah yang pendekatannya disyaki beraliran Wahabi.”
I really would like to see the people claiming to give evidences of what teaching Dr MAZA had given can be classified as “
Wahhabi”. Heck, just give a clear cut definition of what can be considered as Wahhabi and what is not. Also, I really doubt that they could bring any arguments to refute the arguments that Dr MAZA made against whatever they are practicing.
Conclusion of this entry is that, we should stop labelling people that we disagree with. If we disagree with something, we should bring our own arguments to the table. Then people could make their own judgment after listening to both sides as to who is right and who is wrong. By making accusations that even we ourselves could not prove, we are acting like people of the old age and those people we know how they end up being – they were the deniers of the true faith and they died a horrible death. If we do not to plan to end up like them, why are we imitating their behavior and way of thinking?